Pulsar X2 CrazyLight Medium assessment

I had my eye on Pulsar mice for fairly some time earlier than getting my palms on the X2 CrazyLight, as they gave the impression to be aimed toward these with aggressive FPS gaming sensibilities like my very own. After spending quite a lot of time with this explicit mouse, I can affirm that is actually the marketplace for these mice. However regardless of me totally having fun with utilizing the Pulsar X2 CrazyLight, it most likely will not be the best choice on the market for a lot of aggressive FPS avid gamers.

For those who aren’t accustomed to the corporate’s line-up of gaming mice, taking a look at Pulsar’s product pages will be very complicated. Even simply trying on the X2 sequence, there are a complete bunch of various fashions there. There are ‘A’ variations that are ambidextrous, ‘H’ variations which have a much bigger ‘hump’ to them, and so forth, plus completely different dimension variations.

It is the medium-sized X2 CrazyLight that I have been spending time with, though I’ve additionally tried the CrazyLight X2H in mini sizing. Aside from being slightly too small for my hand, I additionally discovered the hump within the latter too pronounced for my liking and slightly distracting, so I’ve caught to contemplating the common one for this assessment.

The primary motive Pulsar mice appealed to me was that they appeared like they have been plucking all the pieces I like about what might be my favorite mouse of all time, the Logitech G Professional X Superlight. They appeared like premium, minimalist, ultra-lightweight gaming mice—ones that provide few pointless frills or design however a light-weight shell and nice buttons.

Fortunately, this hope has been confirmed well-founded with the X2 CrazyLight, because it’s sturdy, light-weight, cozy, its PTFE ft make it glide throughout the mouse pad, and has some satisfying button clicks. There does not really feel like a single ‘low-cost’ a part of this mouse, which is sweet information contemplating its $130 price ticket.

What greatest attests to that is the truth that I’ve discovered myself totally having fun with utilizing it although it is a mouse with a hump. Humped mice are predominantly for avid gamers utilizing a claw-style grip, and I often use a hybrid claw-palm grip that made this mouse initially really feel much less comfy than what I used to be used to. However it actually did not take lengthy in any respect for my hand to settle into claw grip gaming, partially due to the truth that it is fairly a relaxed hump, right here.

Saying all this, the $130 price ticket is the place the true debate lies. It isn’t as costly as a number of the most premium mice available on the market, such because the Razer DeathAdder V4 Professional, nevertheless it’s not precisely 1,000,000 miles away, both.

Characteristic-wise, you are not getting hundreds, however that is type of anticipated with a light-weight mouse like this that is focused at aggressive FPS avid gamers. You get an on/off swap, an underside DPI button, USB-C charging, and completely serviceable, although sadly native reasonably than browser-based, software program. None of these items is especially related to the worth for a mouse like this, although.

Relating to issues which can be related, there’s good and dangerous information. Beginning with the great, this value is affordable for such a premium-feeling, comfy, light-weight mouse.

That final level is price emphasising, too, because the Pulsar mouse could be very gentle at 39 g with dot skates or 41 g with full PTFE skates (my mannequin is 42 g in keeping with my scales, however Pulsar does specify as much as +/- 1 g variation). This undoubtedly places the mouse within the ‘ultralight’ bracket, even when it is not fairly as gentle because the Corsair Sabre V2 Professional. The Pulsar one does have holes in its underside to attain this weight, whereas the Corsair does not have any holes in any respect; however the Corsair does not really feel fairly as premium because the Pulsar, so it is smart.

The dangerous information, nevertheless, comes all the way down to what we have not but mentioned, particularly, the mouse’s precise efficiency. It isn’t that it is a dangerous performer—removed from it, due to as much as 8 kHz polling and a 32K DPI sensor. It is simply not as nice as I would like for the worth and goal market.

Picture 1 of three

The CrazyLight X2 appears to undergo from the identical factor I discovered the not too long ago launched Superb Mannequin O3 Wi-fi to undergo from. Each mice have sensors that observe reliably and precisely when linked through a wired USB-C cable, however this reliability and accuracy take successful when switching over to a wi-fi 2.4 GHz connection, as my testing in Mouse Tester, a devoted mouse sensor monitoring instrument, reveals.

This undoubtedly is not a difficulty with my setup, both, as I’ve examined some mice—noticeably, the Corsair Sabre V2 Professional and Logitech G Professional X Superlight—over wi-fi that do not have this situation in any respect. I additionally made positive to check out the mouse in some completely different USB ports and with the dongle at completely different distances from the mouse. It simply appears to be the case that switching over to wi-fi introduces some inconsistency to the monitoring.

Picture 1 of 4

To be clear, I did not discover this check information translating to inconsistencies in my precise intention in-game. In Counter-Strike 2, as an example, I discovered quick flicks, clean nook turns, and micro-adjustments to trace completely properly, at the very least in keeping with my ageing eyes and fingers. And even the Mouse Tester outcomes themselves aren’t precisely terrible.

Nonetheless, there are undoubtedly mice on the market with higher monitoring over wi-fi, one thing that is made worse by the truth that one such mouse that I’ve examined myself—the unique G Professional X Superlight—is way older than the Pulsar CrazyLight X2. It is potential that some avid gamers with greater ELOs/MMRs and keener eyes and ears may discover this slight inconsistency in-game, and even when not, you may have extra peace of thoughts for high-level aggressive FPS gameplay for those who’re utilizing a mouse with higher wi-fi monitoring.

For somebody like me who is not precisely aiming for the leaderboards, it is a improbable mouse. It managed to win me over to its claw-like grip requirement in a short time, and it is saved me utilizing it for much longer than I needed to, simply because it feels so good below my palm and really easy to fling across the high of my mouse pad throughout Counter-Strike classes.

It’d go with out saying, nevertheless it’s fantastic for informal gaming, too. Though for those who’re an informal gamer, you may favor a heavier mouse with higher battery life. I managed to get a number of days out of the Pulsar operating at 1,000 Hz polling, together with utilizing it for work in the course of the day and gaming for a number of hours over a few evenings. And though I did not file my hours intently sufficient to say exactly what the battery life is, it could’t add as much as a lot.

For the worth and given it is aimed toward aggressive gaming, I would most likely favor the peace of thoughts I would get from utilizing a mouse with extra constant monitoring over wi-fi. The marginally poorer monitoring over wi-fi most likely will not be an enormous deal for many avid gamers, even aggressive ones, however when you may get good gaming mice that carry out higher on this regard, it makes the Pulsar tablet slightly tougher to swallow.

Greatest gaming mouse 2026

All our present suggestions

Pulsar X2 CrazyLight Medium: Value Comparability