Picture by Andrius Petrucenia, CC BY-SA 2.0.
|
Sean Strickland is looking out UFC CEO Dana White following the chief’s controversial response to an assassination try in opposition to President Donald Trump, BroBible reported. The strain stems from a violent incident on the White Home Correspondents’ Dinner. Whereas many attendees sought cowl through the chaos, White described the occasion in a method that has prompted Strickland to label him a sociopath.
The incident occurred on a Saturday night when an alleged gunman opened fireplace contained in the venue. The state of affairs escalated rapidly, leading to harm to a Secret Service agent. Whereas the scene was marked by tables being flipped and attendees hiding for security, White selected to stay standing. He later spoke with the media about his expertise, noting that he ignored instructions to take cowl.
“Impulsively, it simply began getting noisy. Tables began getting flipped over, guys operating in with weapons, and so they had been screaming, ‘Get down!’” White says. “I didn’t get down. It was f—ing superior, and I actually took each minute of it in. It was a fairly loopy, distinctive expertise.”
Strickland, who’s presently getting ready for his upcoming UFC 328 struggle in opposition to Khamzat Chimaev, didn’t maintain again when requested about these feedback. Throughout a media session, he questioned the psychological state of the UFC boss. It’s clear that Strickland views White’s lack of concern as an indication of one thing deeper.
“I’m positive Dana White is a sociopath,” he famous. Strickland went on to investigate the mindset he believes White possesses. “Let’s be trustworthy. At that degree, what he’s completed, the s— he offers with. I’m positive he’s an excellent narcissistic sociopath.”
He means that the high-pressure atmosphere of operating an enormous group just like the UFC is perhaps the catalyst for this habits. “For him, the lizard mind doesn’t compute so he was like, “Fing carry it on dude, let’s go motherf—er’. Which I respect,” he continued. “He’s a s–okay f–okay, dude. I imply, come on. Did we not assume that? Dana White, the man’s in all probability a sociopath. I’d in all probability even say a psychopath.”
The occasion itself was a serious safety breach. President Trump was on stage when Secret Service brokers intervened to escort him to security. Different notable figures, together with Vice President JD Vance, first girl Melania Trump, and press secretary Karoline Leavitt, had been additionally evacuated. Legislation enforcement later recognized the suspect as 31-year-old Cole Tomas Allen, who was discovered to be carrying a shotgun, a handgun, and a number of knives. Interim police chief Jeffery Carroll famous that the suspect engaged in a shootout with Secret Service members earlier than being taken into custody.
Appearing lawyer common Todd Blanche has since said that the investigation is ongoing, although preliminary findings recommend the suspect was focusing on members of the administration. President Trump addressed the state of affairs on Fact Social shortly after the occasion, confirming the shooter had been apprehended and praising the efforts of regulation enforcement.
This isn’t the primary time White has been concerned in discussions relating to the security of President Trump. The 2 have a long-standing friendship, and White has beforehand expressed concern for the president. In a February 2025 interview, White talked about that he had urged Trump to exit the 2024 presidential race following a earlier capturing incident at a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania. White recalled telling the president to cease, citing his perception that Trump has a very good life and will deal with different issues.
Regardless of the gravity of the state of affairs on the White Home Correspondents’ Dinner, White stays targeted on his upcoming initiatives. He’s scheduled to advertise an occasion known as UFC Freedom 250, which is about to happen on the White Home garden on June 14.
The general public response to White’s feedback has been different, however Strickland’s blunt evaluation highlights a big divide in how folks understand the CEO’s response to hazard.
